The CMR Advisory Council is proud to present the CMR Bibliography. In line with our objective to contribute to the uniform interpretation of the CMR we wish to make the legal literature on CMR in the contracting states more accessible by compiling a bibliography of everything that has been written about the CMR.
Included in the bibliography are inter alia dissertations, monographies, commentaries, journal articles, case comments etc. Also included are publications on Transport law that deal with CMR but also with other conventions, provided that the discussion of CMR is substantial enough.
Furthermore, we have not made any restrictions as to the language of the publications to be included, although for publications in a different language than English we have added an office translation of the title.
Although the CMR Advisory Council has tried to be as comprehensive as possible in compiling the CMR Bibliography and despite the fact that it already contains 805 entries, we do realize that we may or even must have missed numerous publications that deserve to be included in the CMR bibliography as well. For this reason, we plan to publish an update on the CMR Bibliography each year in January that will add new publications from the past year as well as any additional publications from previous years that have been brought to our attention.
If you wish to contribute to the process of updating and expanding the CMR Bibliography please send an email (if possible with a pdf-file of the relevant publication) to: gbonjour@idit.fr.
You can also find our bibliography on the Idit website www.idit.fr tab: BASE CMR.
Authors: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
| Authors | Year | Citation |
|---|---|---|
GRUBER, A. |
GRUBER, A., How Article 17.2 of the CMR is interpreted by the French court , Tijdschrift Vervoer & Recht, 2017-2, p.47 |
|
HA NGOC, J. |
HA NGOC, J., La Convention CMR et les Règles de Rotterdam [The CMR Convention and the Rotterdam Rules], Revue de Droit Uniforme 2016, p. 469-486 |
|
HAAK, K. |
HAAK, K., Haftungsbegrenzungen und ihre Durchbrechung nach der CMR in den Niederlanden [Limitation of liability and its breach under the CMR in the Netherlands], Transportrecht, 2004, 104-107 |
|
HAAK, K. F. |
HAAK, K. F., El transporte por superposición camión sobre buque ro-ro: la solución holandesa, in: Actualidad jurídica del transporte por carretera: in memoriam F. M. Sánchez Gamborino [Overlapping truck on ro-ro transport: the Dutch solution], Madrid: Fundación Francisco Corell, 2005, pp. 397-406. |
|
HAAK, K. F. |
HAAK, K. F., The CMR – Interpretation, in: IRU (ed), International Carriage of Goods by Road (CMR) , London, 1987, 224 |
|
HAAK, K. F. |
HAAK, K. F., The Liability of the Carrier under the CMR , The Hague, Stichting Vervoeradres, 1986. |
|
HAAK, K.F. |
HAAK, K.F., Comment Veldhuizen/Beurskens – Hoge Raad 15 September 2015 [Comment ON Veldhuizen v. Beurskens – Supreme Court September 15, 2015], Nederlandse Jurisprudentie (NJ) 2016/219 |
|
HAAK, K.F. |
HAAK, K.F., De kwade kans van bewuste roekeloosheid, Een beweerdelijk ontbreken van subjectieve wetenschap kan de vervoerder die zijn zorgverplichtingen met voeten trad, niet baten. [The wicked chance of conscious recklessness, An alleged lack of subjective knowledge cannot benefit the carrier who has trampled on his duty of care.], Th.M. de Boer et al. (eds.), Strikwerda’s Conclusies, Liber Amicorum Luc Strikwerda, Deventer, Kluwer, 2011, p. 107-119 |
|
HAAK, K.F. |
HAAK, K.F., Optioneel vervoer en het toepasselijke recht [Optional transport and the applicable law], in: Brinkhof, J.J. et al. (eds.), Contracteren internationaal, Liber Amicorum F.W. Grosheide, Den Haag, Boom, 2006, p. 303-315. |
|
HAAK, K.F. |
HAAK, K.F., Jurisdictieperikelen in het Internationaal wegvervoer: het einde van het sprookje van de verklaring voor recht? [Jurisdiction issues in international road transport: has the fiary tale about the negative declaratory action come to an end?], European Transport Law (ETL), 2004, p. 137-149 |
|
HAAK, K.F. |
HAAK, K.F., De scope van de CMR: expansief of restrictief? [The scope of the CMR: expansive or restrictive?, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Handelsrecht (NTHR) 2010-2, p. 46-59 |
|
HAAK, K.F. |
HAAK, K.F., Naar een vrij verkeer van CMR-vonnissen in Europa? [Towards a free exchange of CMR-judgments in Europe?], Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Handelsrecht (NTHR) 2009-2, p. 85-97. |
|
HAAK, K.F. |
HAAK, K.F., Europäische Lösung der deutsch-niederländischen Kontroverse in der CMR-Interpretation? Präjudizielle Fragen des höchsten niederländischen Berufungsgerichts (Hoge Raad) an den Gerichtshof der Europäischen Gemeinschaften (EuGH) bezüglich des Quartetts Zuständigkeit, Anhängigkeit, Anerkennung und Vollstreckung. [European solution to the German-Dutch controversy in the CMR interpretation? Prejudicial questions from the Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) to the ECJ regarding the quartet of jurisdiction, lis pendens, recognition and enforcement], Transportrecht (TranspR) 5-2009, p. 189-199. |
|
HAAK, K.F. |
HAAK, K.F., Revision der CMR? [Revision of the CMR?], Transportrecht, 29 (2006), pp. 325-336 |
|
HAAK, K.F. |
HAAK, K.F., Is het wenselijk/noodzakelijk de CMR te herzien? [Is it desirable/neceesary to reform the CMR?], Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Handelsrecht (NTHR), 2006-3, p. 69-81. |
|
HAAK, K.F. |
HAAK, K.F., Ro-Ro Transport under CMR, Art. 2: The Dutch Solution , Lloyd’s Maritime & Commercial Law Quarterly (LMCLQ) 2005, p. 308-315. |
|
HAAK, K.F. |
HAAK, K.F., CMR-Übereinkommen: Vertrag zu Lasten Dritter?, in: SCHACHTSCHNEIDER, K.A. – PIPER, H. – HÜBSCH, M. (Hrsg.) – Transport – Wirtschaft – Recht. Gedächtnisschrift für Johann Georg Helm(Schriften zum Wirtschaftsrecht, 133) [CMR Convention: Contract at Third Party’s Expense?], in: SCHACHTSCHNEIDER, K.A. – PIPER, H. – HÜBSCH, M. (Eds.) – Transport law], Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 2001, 91-98 |
|
HAAK, K.F. |
HAAK, K.F., De onstuitbare opmars van de CMR [Belgisch-Nederlands CMR-Seminar, 26 mei 2000] [The unstoppable advance of CMR [Belgian-Dutch CMR Seminar, 26 May 2000], European Transport Law, 35 (2000-3), 307-311 |
|
HAAK, K.F. |
HAAK, K.F., St. Clair en het stapelvervoer – Hoge Raad 14 juni 1996, Schip & Schade 1996, 86 [ St. Clair and Piggyback transport – Hoge Raad 14 June 1996, Schip & Schade 1996, 86], Tijdschrift Vervoer & Recht (TVR) 1-1996, p. 9-12 |
|
HAAK, K.F. |
HAAK, K.F., The Liability of the Carrier under the CMR , The Hague, 1986, XVII-395. |
|
HAAK, K.F. |
HAAK, K.F., De aansprakelijkheid van de wegvervoerder ingevolge de CMR [The road carrier’s liability under the CMR], Stichting Vervoerandres, Den Haag, 1984., 274 |
|
HAAK, K.F. |
HAAK, K.F., De aansprakelijkheid van de wegvervoerder ingevolge de CMR [The road carrier’s liability under the CMR], Stichting Vervoerandres, Den Haag, 1984., 274 |
|
HAAK, K.F. |
HAAK, K.F., Rechtsvinding in het internationale lucht- en wegvervoerrecht [Applying the law in international road and air transport], Nederlands Juristenblad (NJB) 1979, p. 25-30. |
|
HAAK, K.F. (with HOEKS,M.A.I.H.) |
HAAK, K.F. (with HOEKS,M.A.I.H.), Arrangements of intermodal transport in the field of conflicting conventions , Journal of International Maritime Law (JIML), 2004, p. 422-433. |
|
HAAK, K.F. (with KOOT, F.L.) |
HAAK, K.F. (with KOOT, F.L.), Bewuste roekeloosheid in het vervoerrecht [Conscious recklessness in transport law], in: Haak, K.F., Koot, F.L. (eds.), Bewuste roekeloosheid in het privaatrecht, Deventer, Kluwer, 2004, p. 13-51. |
|
HANBO, T. – LIMAN, S. – ÅHL, L. |
HANBO, T. – LIMAN, S. – ÅHL, L., Vägtransportörens ansvar vid internationell vägtrafik: En introduktion till CMR-konventionen [Road Carrier Liability in International Road Traffic: An Introduction to the CMR Convention], IFU Utbildnings AB, Stockholm, 1992 |
|
HANOTIAU, B. |
HANOTIAU, B., Le vice propre et la nature propre de la marchandise : causes d’exonération de la responsabilité du transporteur routier (Articles 17 & 2 et 17 & 4 de la CMR) [The inherent vice and the inherent nature of the goods: grounds for exonerating the road carrier from liability (Articles 17 & 2 and 17 & 4 of the CMR)], in: Liber Amicorum Jacques Putzeys, Etudes de droit des transports, Bruxelles, 1996, p. 203 |
|
HAPP (and Roth) |
Roth and Happ, Interpretation of Uniform Law Instruments According to Principles of International Law , (1997) II U.L.R. 700. |
|
HARDINGHAM, A. C. |
HARDINGHAM, A. C., Damages under CMR: The Decision of the House of Lords , Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, (1978), 51. |
|
HARDINGHAM, A. C. |
HARDINGHAM, A. C., Actions against Successive Carriers under CMR , Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, (1978), 499 |
|
HARDINGHAM, A. C. |
HARDINGHAM, A. C., The Delay Provisions of CMR , Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, (1979), 193. |
|
HARDINGHAM, A. C. |
HARDINGHAM, A. C., Aspects of the Limitation of Actions under CMR , Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, (1979), 362 |
|
HARDINGHAM, A. C. |
HARDINGHAM, A. C., CMR Safeguarding the Parties’ Interest , Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, (1981), 306 |
|
HARDY J |
HARDY J, L’interprétation des traités internationaux rédigés dans plusieurs langues [The interpretation of international treaties drafted in several languages], thèse dactyl., Paris, 1960. |
|
HAUBOLD, J. |
HAUBOLD, J., CMR und europäisches Zivilverfahrensrecht: Klarstellungen zu internationaler Zuständigkeit und Rechtshängigkeit [CMR and European civil procedure law: clarifications on international jurisdiction and lis pendens], Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax), 26 (2006), pp. 224-229 |
|
HAUBOLD, J. |
HAUBOLD, J., Internationale Zuständigkeit nach CMR und EuGVÜ/LugÜ (zu OLG Dresden, 24. 11. 1998 – 14 U 713/98. [International jurisdiction according to CMR and EuGVÜ/LugÜ (on OLG Dresden, 24 November 1998 – 14 U 713/98], Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax), (2000), 91-96. |
|
HEDETOFT, A. |
HEDETOFT, A., CMR-Lovens 38 – en reklamationsregel [CMR Act 38 – a complaint rule], Ugeskrift for Retsvæsen, (1997), 106 |
|
HELM, J. G. |
HELM, J. G., Das Übereinkommen über den Beförderungsvertrag im internationalen Strassengüterverkehr (CMR) und seine Anwendung auf den grenzüberschreitenden Speditionsvertrag [The Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road (CMR) and its application to the cross-border freight forwarding contract], IPRax, 2 (1982), 225 |
|
HELM, J. G. |
HELM, J. G., Übereinkommen über den Beförderungsvertrag im internationalen Strassengüterverkehr (CMR) – Direkte Inanspruchnahme des Haftpflichtsversicherers – Wertersatz bei Beschädigung von Gütern [Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road (CMR) – Direct recourse to the liability insurer – Compensation for damaged goods], Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts, 1 (1981), 46. |
|
HELM, J.G. |
HELM, J.G., Frachtrecht II – CMR [Transport Law II – CMR], 2. Auflage, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, 2002, 717 pp. |
|
HELM, J.G. |
HELM, J.G., Ergänzung der CMR durch deutsches Recht nach Aufhebung von § 1 Abs. 2 KVO [Supplement to the CMR through German law after the cancellation of § 1 Abs. 2 KVO], Transportrecht, 12 (1989), 389 |
|
HELM, J.G. |
HELM, J.G., Welches Verschulden steht gem. Art. 29 CMR dem Vorsatz gleich? [Which fault is equivalent to intent according to Art. 29 CMR?], IPRax, 5 (1985), 10 |
|
HELM, J.G. |
HELM, J.G., Frachtrecht, Güterbeförderung auf der Straße [Transport law, Carriage of goods by road], Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, 1979, 556 pp. |
|
HELM, J.G. |
HELM, J.G., Haftung für Schäden an Frachtgütern – Studien zur Schadensersatzpflicht aus Frachtgeschäften und zur Konkurrenz vertraglicher und auBervertraglicher Ersatzansprüche [Liability for damage to cargo – Studies on liability for damages arising from contracts of carriage and on the competition between contractual and non-contractual claims for compensation], Hab. Frankfurt am Main, Karlsruhe, Verlag C.F. Müller, 1966 |
|
HEMMES, J. E. J. |
HEMMES, J. E. J., La normativa sobre el transporte por carretera en Holanda [Road transport regulations in the Netherlands], Revista General de Derecho, 44 (1988), N. 528, 5305 |
|
HEMMES, J. E. J. |
HEMMES, J. E. J., El art. 3 de la convención CMR: un caso concreto de responsabilidad del transportista, que resulta ser el más habitual, in Actualidad jurídica del transporte por carretera: in memoriam F.M. Sánchez Gamborino [Art. 3 of the CMR Convention: a specific case of carrier liability, which happens to be the most common one], Madrid: Fundación Francisco Corell, 2005, pp. 413-418 |
|
HENDRIKSE, M. |
HENDRIKSE, M., Should one adapt Article 29 CMR? , European Journal of Commercial Contract Law (EJCCL) 2017-1/2, p. 22-26. |
|
HENDRIKSE, M.L. and VAN HUIZEN, Ph.H.J.G. (eds.) |
HENDRIKSE, M.L. and VAN HUIZEN, Ph.H.J.G. (eds.), CMR: Internationaal vervoer van goederen over de weg – Een praktische en rechtsvergelijkende benadering [CMR: International carriage of goods by road – A practical and comparative approach, Zutphen, Paris, 2005, |
|
HERBER, R. |
HERBER, R., Anspruch des Empfängers gegen den Unterfrachtführer aus dem Unterfrachtvertrag? – BGH I ZR 50/05 vom 14.6.2007 und die Folgen [Claim of the recipient against the sub-carrier arising from the sub-carriage contract? – BGH I ZR 50/05 of 14.6.2007 and the consequences], Transportrecht (TranspR) 6-2008, p. 239-241 |
|
HERBER, R. |
HERBER, R., Neue Entwicklungen im Recht des Multimodaltransports [New developments in the law on multimodal transports], Transportrecht (TranspR) 11/12-2006, p. 435-439. |